The setups I include on this blog are used in conjunction with the 3/10macd and the criteria I ascribe to it as a way to alert me to an existing condition of price. The key concept to take away from this blog is that I try to anticipate what will happen on the higher time frame by using a faster time frame to trigger the trade setup. I do not trade a "system" I use two indicators to clue me in to price conditions. Please read the Disclaimer located in the sidebar of this site. I can be contacted via email at toddstrade@gmail.com
I am always open to questions, comments, or suggestions on how to improve this blog.


Showing posts with label 2a. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2a. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

IWM

Was the only one (out of QQQ, SPY, and DIA) that had a worthwhile entry on the higher time frame.  Currently tagged the initial target.
All of the other hourly charts had a negative slow line (4a) and I would rather trade a 2a long as opposed to a 4a.

For example, on the SPY the fast line (hourly, below right) turned positive, but the slow line was still negative.  Just not something I would want to enter long, I would prefer to wait for a pullback in that circumstance

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Wed 05_08


Breadth - zero-line bounce on the Adv/Decl
Volume profile coming into the day -

Higher time frames:
SPY

ES with globex

ES with globex intraday

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Tue 05_07


HIgher time frame, watching potential momentum roll-over

ES with Globex

Higher time frame ES with globex

Thursday, January 10, 2013

thu 01_10

today's trade
A key for the above chart to define the horizontal lines and dots.  For further explanation, see this link:  

The morning's trade can be seen in a previous post.

Higher time frame, keeps going higher.  The criteria setup has been 3a-to-1b-to-1a continuation.  A little concerting that the 65-min momentum is still so weak.

A few looks at the daily SPY

The channels in the SPY have been very tight and symmetrical.  Playing the channel extremes has been fruitful

Inverted roof (below).  Can break either way.  See Bulkowski's write-up here


Thursday, November 29, 2012

Thu. 11_29

Today's trade:

A key for the above chart to define the horizontal lines and dots.  For further explanation, see this link:  



3 trades. Blue arrows = etries, Black arrows = exits First long entry, I wasn't expecting much from it. Second Long entry, Got whipped out. Was quite happy with how I was managing the trade at the time, but SO got suckered out of it, so I lost that mental battle. Ended up getting back into it for the same price of the original entry 15-minutes prior (before the official "trigger).
MAE for the (12-noon) trade was "only?" a point and a half and got out with a point and a quarter loss :/
Getting back long on the snap-back profits were taken with +2.75 points and then again at +2.5 points, for an average +2.5 points.  Exits were based on a confluence of a Fib. projection (not pictured), resistance (in the form of a prior breakdown point) and the overnight highs (pictured in the 3m chart above).
Unfortunately I didn't take the short entry that is marked with an "X".  The setup being a price pullback, indicated by the "2b" criteria on the 15-min 3/10macd.
The underlying "criteria" of the day was anticipation of the 2c-2d turning into 2a (and possibly 1a, which didn't happen. 1a would have likely been the result of price (momentum) breaking the highs of the day).

On the higher time frame I wanted to make a clarification.  Going into Wednesday I was leaning with a short bias and the trade failed, but I wanted to run through the bias process.
My premise was as follows:
- We were due for a pullback off of the most recent momentum on the Daily chart.
- On the smaller time frame I was looking for either:
      - the fast line turning red, OR
      - the fast line turning red, pulling back to the slow line and then turning back down in the fast line.
(essentially an XYZ zig-zag pattern in the fast line).  Shorting the initial negative reading of the faster time frame's fast line is always a higher risk trade in my opininion, while entering after a pullback has ocurred in the fast line is more favorable.  So...
  The distance between the initial short entry (blue down-arrow on the 65m chart) and the lows of the move was $1.42 or about 14.25 points on the e-mini.  The official stop-out trigger (Second black down-arrow) was $1.04, or about 10 points on the E-mini.
So, here's the thing; if I know this short entry to be higher risk (because eventually I'm going to be anticipating a pullback in the fast line before getting a higher probability trade) the trade should have been lightened as price comes into support.  So if I took half of the position off at support and took a loss on a stop out, damages could have been paired.  The approach I use is not meant to be a "system" as exits are more discretionary in nature.


Notice, that in the daily chart price has been increasing while the fast line on the 3/10macd is decreasing.  A typical sign of a short squeeze environment and an important lesson in using an indicator, price can still increase while the indicator is decreasing.
From here we could see:
- The daily chart fast line pull back more, where we would look for the 65m fast line to turn red and/or turn red, pull back then tick down again.
- Otherwise, we could see the daily chart fast line tick up, which would trigger on the 65 min chart with an up-tick of its fast line (which would in all likelihood be a price bar close greater than today's highs).

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Wed. 10_17

Opened just above the previous week's open and at the previous day's high.
Another breakout entry with quick exits (too quick perhaps).
The overnight highs ($146) acted as a significant pivot, as did the opening swing high which saw price ricochet off of.

A couple of entries on the long and short side.  Shoulda/Coulda/Woulda taken the 2c-2d criteria (15-min) entry just before 1:30.  The short just after noon was somewhat an all-or-nothing trade.  In other words, I should have taken half off at $146 which coincided around vwap at that time, but figured I'd either take a more or less b/e trade if it gets a strong bounce off of vwap or let it run to $145.75 (was thinking $143.70, but wanted to get more of a "guarantee" fill, which turned out to well).

While the Advance/Decline has seen some divergence these past two days, the Up/Down differential has barely seen a negative reading all week.

The daily coming up on that upper channel.   A 50% retrace would be nice to see, but being Options Expiration week, we could see things get manic.

an update on the IWM, QQQ, DIA daily charts posted over the weekend